Image analysis to reveal modifications...

A really interesting piece from Wired Magazine: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/researchers-ana.html

"High Fashion Photography" ???

This question was posted to an online forum:

"What makes High fashion photography?"

My Answer:

The difference I think you're reaching for is catalog vs. editorial style. In catalog photography you shoot the entire collection. In an editorial style you try to sum up the entire collection in a short series of images.

In real editorial fashion photography, at a purist level, you look at what is now and what is past and you create a very selective visual essay. It doesn't always work that way. Most magazines want their advertisers' products represented in the editorials, so what you see in Vogue etc. is not normally true editorials because the editors are influenced by a need to keep their employers happy.

"High fashion" is a bad translation of the French "Haute Couture," which is a very specific kind of clothing, and actually translates to "high sewing." Haute Couture is the very highest level of fashion in terms of craft and quality workmanship. They don't sell it at Macy's. They barely sell it at Bergdorf Goodman. It's one of a kind pieces, usually made for a specific person. It is actually a legal distinction and only a small group of fashion design companies are allowed to call their work "Haute Couture."

slide show: The Decline of Fashion Photography

This is a fantastic little slide show (with commentary) over on Slate.com.

The Decline of Fashion Photography
An argument in pictures.
By Karen Lehrman

I don't know that what is shown is a "decline" so much as a simple progression. Fashion was never about the clothes. Stories are certainly still being told through the images. I do like the idea of going back to not allowing gratuitous text to be plastered all over the negative space in images printed in magazines. It's usually a blank area for a reason.

"The Cube"

This is an early Jim Henson experimental film (made for television).

About an hour long, it predates and presupposes the concept for the feature film Cube by a couple decades. Definitely the "mindfuck" genre.

Thanks to Stephen Bodi for passing this along.